🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to approve a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," said a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly happening at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies adopt a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.