🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.